Почему "дхамма" переводят "феномен" и что это значит?

In my understanding of the Thai Forest tradition, Nibbana is understood as an unconditioned awareness, never born (without beginning) and undying. It is sometimes described as that which knows or even ‘the one that knows,’ although the latter is said to be a Thai colloquial expression and does not refer to a ‘self.’

In this view, unconditioned awareness is a reality apart from the five aggregates. Ācariya Mahā Boowa, a great master of the Thai Forest tradition, explains:

Whatever arises has to vanish; whatever is true, whatever is a natural principle in and of itself, won’t vanish. In other words, the pure mind won’t vanish. Everything of every sort may vanish, but that which knows their vanishing doesn’t vanish. This vanishes, that vanishes, but the one which knows their vanishing doesn’t vanish.[9]

And in talking of Nibbana as ‘unbinding,’ Ajahn Thanissaro writes:

The Buddha describes it as pleasure, but it’s not a pleasant feeling, and so it’s not an aggregate. Similarly, he describes it as a type of consciousness, but one that’s not known in conjunction with the six sense bases. In other words, it has no object. Because it doesn’t fall within the consciousness-aggregate, it lies outside of past, present, and future. Outside of space, it has “neither coming nor going nor staying in place.” It’s a separate dimension entirely.[10]

https://www.buddhistinquiry.org/article/reflections-on-nibbana