Сомнения Бэмби и неправильный перевод названия шастры "О генеалогии патриархов" Бодхидхармы

Among Shakyamuni's ten greatest disciples, Ananda was foremost in learning. But he didn't know the Buddha. All he did was study and memorize. Arhats don't know the Buddha. All they know are so many practices for realization, and they become trapped by cause and effect. Such is a mortal's karma: no escape from birth and death. By doing the opposite of what lie intended, such people blaspheme the Buddha. Killing them would not be wrong. The sutras say, "Since icchantikas are incapable of belief, killing them would be blameless, whereas people who believe reach the state of Buddhahood."

For example, such actions as digging the ground, mowing the grass, felling trees, cutting up
corpses, ill-speaking, and lashing do not call forth karmic returns. Killing an icchantika comes
within the same category. No karmic results ensue. Why not? Because no Brahmins and no five
laws to begin with faith, etc. are involved here [Maybe: no Brahmins are concerned with the
"five roots" of faith, vigour, mindfulness, concentration, and Wisdom]. For this reason, killing
[of this kind] does not carry one off to hell.

Потому что всё, что сделано с намерением, имеет последствия.

Тест, грешить "осознанно" и грешить "намеренно" - это немного разные вещи.

Вы предпочитаете не осознавать, что делаете глупости? Или Вы их не делаете ? Тогда, значит, Вы - неведомый доселе святой...

Вопрос чисто схоластический, т.к.  а) теория иччхантиков не сохранилась, кажется, ни в одной из традиций и б) не существует критериев их опознания