Будда (ложь и буддизм)

Q: If in this state of Extinction-without-remainder there exist no hindrances, and if therefore the arhat in that state, just like the Tathāgata, is free from hindrances, [why then does the arhat in this state not perform the works of a Tathāgata]?
A: Because, in contrast to the Tathāgata, he has not cultivated the "earlier resolve" and because his predisposition-to-salvation (gotra) is constituted thus and not otherwise, so that the arhat necessarily, without the intention of raising himself out of it again for the benefit of others, enters into Extinction-without-remainder. Consequently he does not perform the works of a Buddha.

Q: Does a person who has entered into the state of Extinction-without-remainder possess power over the physical etc or does he not possess this power ?
A: He possesses this power.

Q: If he possesses the power over the physical etc, does he also allow the physical etc actually to become manifest or does he not allow it to manifest ?
A: Some allow it actually to become manifest, others not: whoever has entered into the state of Extinction-without-remainder as a Tathāgata allows it to become manifest; whoever has entered Extinction-without-remainder as a different [type] (i.e. as an arhat = sravaka), however, does not actually allow it to become manifest.

Хотелось бы однако узнать мнение специалистов. Неужели в махаяна-буддизме, нет совершенно идиотской доктрины, что все живые, не-просветлённые существа,  это одно существо, которое и есть будда, и оно действует в сансаре?

... так как это весьма сверхъестественная религия, способная менять то что естественно, на то, что для людей не естественно.

Такое впечатление, что Будда дал выход своей злобе, создав своё учение. Счастья, в том смысле в каком понимают люди,   учение Будды  не обещает, а обещает совсем другое, да ещё и рассказывает о страданиях.