про "привязанность" к Дхарме

1. The proclivity of attachment (rāgānuśaya) should be abandoned: if it had the pure (anāsrava) for its cognitive object, it should not be rejected; just as the predilection for wholesome factors (kuśaladharmacchanda), (which takes the form of desire [abhilāṣa], but which is right view
[samyagdṛṣṭi],) should not be rejected.

Chapter Five: Exposition of the Proclivities

Стих 16. (1) Attachment is not concerned with the pure [cognitive object], because
attachment should be rejected (varjya); (2) hostility [is not concerned with the pure
cognitive object], because the pure [cognitive object] does not harm; (3) conceit and
(4–5) the two esteemings (parāmarśa) [are not concerned with the pure cognitive
object], because the pure [cognitive object] is peaceful [śānta], pure [śuddha], and the
supreme or excellent [agra; uttama].

Автокомментарий 1. The proclivity of attachment (rāgānuśaya) should be abandoned: if it had the pure (anāsrava) for its cognitive object, it should not be rejected; just as the predilection for wholesome factors (kuśaladharmacchanda), (which takes the form of desire [abhilāṣa], but which is right view [samyagdṛṣṭi],) should not be rejected